1). Listing statistics from sources that directly benefit from the flow of money from the biggest pharm companies in the world… should I even need to say.

2). Debt based system delusion? You can honestly take a look out your window and say that? I don't need to have studied economics (which I have) to know that we have a failing and corrupt monetary system, and have done so since the Mesopotamian Empire, particularly since the Babylonians took power.

3). Wikipedia is banned by many institutions of learning (college / university level) around the world. In fact, the last two schools of medicine I studied at prohibited the use of Wikipedia across all essays, assignments, case studies etc. They use an algorithm or 'scraper' if you will, to scan Wikipedia parallel to your own completed works. If there are corresponding / copied paragraphs, or if they determine you have paraphrased a certain percentage of data… sorry, but you're rewriting everything. Not only that, but professors the world over have banned the use of Wikipedia in their classrooms. A brief search on the internet will tell you as much.

I can surmise by your rants that you loathe 'conspiracy theorist's' but just like them, you seem to lump everyone with a conflicting point of view or interest, into the same ugly pie. Alex Jones? I cant stand the man. Can't stand his violent aggressive demeanor or his sardonic, protagonist nature. The only time I've ever listened to him is when my flatmate would leave his door open, as he wouldn't quit listening to his radio show 24/7. Equally (this sentence is of my own accord), I don't pay attention to people like David Icke or Peter Joseph (although they do have a few good ideas). My research and passion for such (which is over half my life time) goes a bit deeper than Alex Jones and YouTube videos.

Funny, I actually praised your research. Good one on seeing 'red' mate, maybe you should take a look inwards, perhaps take up meditation?

Peace, Love

1. Your "debt system" conspiracy delusion has nothing to do with this story. Go to Infowars if you want to talk that shit.
2. Wikipedia is NOT banned by medical institutions. Any conclusion I make is based on peer-reviewed articles. I use Wikipedia as a dictionary for more complex terms. I'm not going to explain what risk capital is. I'm going to use Wikipedia, but only if I have read the article. Almost all Wikipedia articles I reference on anything on this blog site was written or edited by me. But again, it is not used to make the salient points, just to give a quick link to an article about the brain. Of course, if you had critical reading skills you'd understand that, but with your head so far up the ass of Alex Jones and Fox News, it's hard to converse with you.

Vaccines very very very rarely have serious side effects. But guess what? Chicken pox has serious side effects a lot less rarely than the vaccine. And treating chicken pox is nearly impossible. It's a virus that once it enters the body, does it's thing until the immune system destroys "most" of it. Some of it stays in the neural bundle at the base of the spinal cord, only to reappear later as a new chickenpox infection, often called shingles, which is a worse, more dangerous, more painful version of the disease. Stopping chickenpox stops shingles.

I almost stopped reading though when you used IMS, WHO and Paul Offit as sources of information for outlining vaccine profits. Also, all money funneled through the current debt based system of trading, and data gleaned from such, will always be highly suspect to me.

I guess if you want to make serious profits from such a historically 'un-bankable' sector, one way is to ramp up the fear, push incentives, lobby government with hundreds of millions per day etc, which surprise surprise, is exactly what is happening.

As a side note, there is a reason why Wikipedia is now banned by medical institutions / schools of learning, the world over, as a credible source of information (just thought I'd chuck that in there).

Peace

From the kids I have raised, to friends and family, by and large we all eat organic and travel the route of natural medicine, and illness rarely touches us (my generation are hitting the ceiling of 40). I have been to the doctors once in the last 13 years. The only reason I would use allopathic / western medicine is if I need a specific diagnoses and/or use of specialized equipment, of if I need something specific surgery. Most other aspects of poor health, Mother Nature attends to, no prob.

As for the monetary side of the coin, I agree that there needs to be tighter regulation concerning the commercial sale of 'natural' remedies. Big business has taken the diagnosis / prognosis out of the hands of the 8th generation Chinese Doctor, whose family / teachers have worked with the plant, or the local consultation of the herbalist who will work with you in providing an accurate plan concerning contraindications, and stamped it on a label, plastered it on the back of a bottle, and sold it as the next cure-all. When big business becomes involved, such things occur, across all sectors.

Peace

As I have stated a number of times, I do not state opinions (unless I say "opinion" in the title). I state hypotheses or theories supported by evidence.

Here's an opinion based on the observations of the laughable attempts by dope smokers to show that there is a medical benefit–they invent shit so that they can get high legally. Well, I think that pot should be legal. But I would suggest anyone who needs to smoke pot or drink alcohol or snort coke just to get through life needs a psychiatrist. Period.

You may want to believe that pot treats autism. Bring real scientific evidence in the form of clinical trials published in real scientific, peer-reviewed, high impact factor journals. Then I might even write about it, because that would be fascinating.

But don't pull the strawman out about what I know and don't know. What I know about autism and neurological disorders would be considered impressive. And don't throw the bullshit about not being a parent of an autistic child as a reason why I cannot demand scientific evidence that dope smoking treats autism. I can. And besides what you know and don't know about me personally and my children would make your strawman even more pathetic.