Skip to content
Home » No evidence of post-vaccine mortality – a systematic review

No evidence of post-vaccine mortality – a systematic review

There is a belief by the anti-vaccine world that there is plenty of evidence of post-vaccine mortality. For example, Dorit Rubinstein Reiss and I have written two articles, about Nick Catone and Colton Berrett, that refute parental claims about post-vaccine mortality involving their children. Those boys’ deaths were tragic, but according to the best evidence we have, neither was caused by vaccines.

Post-vaccine mortality is often not causally related. It may feel like one event that follows another event is related, which is the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. There may not be any correlation, let alone causality, that would make us accept that vaccines kill.

Those of us who accept the fact that vaccines are very safe, and indeed, not really a risk for causing death, have found no evidence of post-vaccine mortality over the past couple of decades. This comes from examining the high-quality scientific and medical literature, which may or may not include all incidents of post-vaccine mortality.

Now, I’ve always contended that there is no evidence that there has ever been a death attributed to vaccines. I never agreed with the old adage that “science can’t prove a negative,” but I do think that the burden of proof is on those making that claim. And extraordinary claims, like vaccines cause deaths, demand extraordinary evidence — so far, there is not even ordinary evidence.

Where is the evidence of a link between vaccines and mortality? Sometimes, the absence of evidence can be evidence of absence, Carl Sagan’s claims notwithstanding, especially if we look very carefully for that evidence.

Let’s move on to an important published study that should help our understanding of whether vaccines kill. They don’t.

post vaccine mortality
Photo by on

The scientific article that refutes “vaccines kill”

In an article published in June 2016 in the respected journal Pediatrics, Natalie L. McCarthy, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues examined the deaths of individuals after vaccination, between the ages of 9 and 26, between 1 January 2005, and 31 December 2011, a period of seven years.

During those seven years, there were 1100 deaths identified within the 12 months following any vaccination among nearly 2.2 million patients (receiving nearly 8.5 million vaccines) enrolled in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a collaborative project between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and several managed health care systems, which monitors the safety of vaccines in the United States (see Note 1).

Just to clarify, these 1100 deaths were all deaths after vaccination, which would form the cohort to analyze whether or not these individual deaths are correlated to vaccines, and whether there is any indication of causality.

Of the 1100 deaths identified, the data showed the following:

  • the mean number of days between delivery of the vaccine and death was approximately 179;
  • only 76 deaths (7%) occurred 0 to 30 days post-vaccination;
  • 60 of those 0-30 day deaths followers receipt of 1 vaccine, 11 had received 2 vaccines, 2 had received 3 vaccines, and 3 had received ≥ 4 vaccines.
  • The researchers performed a cluster analysis, a statistical methodology to determine if there are patterns of data over time. As a result, they saw no clusters of data, so chose a 0-30 day window of the risk of death post-vaccination to ascertain biological plausibility and potential causality. There is a belief that adverse effects from vaccines could happen at any time, but that’s not supported by evidence. The temporal link of vaccines to an adverse event happens over a few days.

The next step of the research was to examine the 76 mortality events that occurred within 30 days post-vaccine. Here’s how those broke down:

  • Of the 76 deaths, 17 lacked a medical record of death and had to be excluded from the study. These deaths were reported to state authorities but lacked any information that might have allowed researchers to establish a causal relationship with vaccines (see Note 2).
  • This left 59 with detailed medical records of the death.
  • Of the 59 deaths, 33 were directly attributed to external causes, including murder, suicides, and accidents. These are definitely not related to vaccines, although I wouldn’t put it past an anti-vaxxer to claim otherwise.
  • Further, 25 were related to non-external causes: these included 5 neoplasms, 6 diseases of the circulatory system, 3 diseases of the respiratory system, and one each of Addison disease, Rett syndrome, cerebral palsy, Takayasu disease, aplastic anemia, grand mal seizure, diabetes, obstetric cause, congenital malformation of heart, septic shock, and morbid obesity. None of these would be related to a vaccine within 30 days. For example, neoplasms, or cancer, don’t arise 30 days (or less) from a causal event — the five cases with neoplasms had it well before they received the vaccine.
  • The cause of one death was unknown (again, see Note 2).
post vaccine mortality
Photo by Mufid Majnun on

Examining causality of post-vaccine mortality

The next step of the research was to examine the potential causality between vaccines and the death of the patient. A team of CDC physicians individually reviewed the complete medical record review forms and additional documents to confirm the stated cause of death – they then assessed the possibility of a causal relationship between death and vaccination.

To be thorough, if the documents on the cause of death were incomplete, the CDC ordered coroner’s reports. And if the review at that point could not clarify the cause of death or association with vaccines, investigators from the CDC and each VSD site further studied the case.

Each death was classified according to established criteria for causality assessment. Mortality events were then classified into 3 categories:

  • consistent with a causal relationship between death and vaccine,
  • inconsistent with a causal association, or
  • indeterminate (if the evidence was insufficient to confirm or rule out a causal relationship).

Out of the 59 cases, 56 showed no relationship to vaccines. External causes, like homicide, suicide, and accidents, were obviously eliminated from having a relationship with vaccines. Only three required a deeper assessment to determine whether there was evidence for a causal relationship that would support the claim that vaccines kill.

The results of the examination of those three deaths that showed potential causality from the vaccination were critical to this study. The working group looked at each case carefully:

  • The first case included a patient who had received tetanus and the quadrivalent HPV vaccine 14 days before death — the cause of death given by the coroner was thoracic aortic dissection, a tear in the lining of the aorta which causes blood to flow within the arterial wall. There are no known biologically plausible relationships between vaccines and aortic dissection, a deadly condition. It is generally caused by hypertension, connective tissue disease, chest trauma, or some genetic diseases. Based on the cause of death, and all of the evidence provided, “the working group determined the cause of death to be inconsistent with a causal association between the vaccines received and death.”
  • The second case included a patient who received the Tdap vaccine (for tetanus, pertussis, and diphtheria) and the quadrivalent HPV vaccine 11 days before death. The cause of death was given by the coroner as “unknown.” Lacking a cause of death, the working group was unable to determine a relationship between the vaccine and the death, and could not confirm or rule out a causal association (once again, see Note 2).
  • The third case was a patient that received the quadrivalent HPV vaccine 18 days before death. The cause of death, listed in the patient’s medical report and the coroner’s reports, was sepsis of unknown origin. “The working group categorized the cause of death in this case as indeterminate because of a lack of a confirmed etiology of sepsis and, therefore, lack of evidence to confirm or rule out a causal association.”

Thus, after 8.5 million vaccinations, only three deaths might have been related to the vaccinations. However, a further evaluation showed us that one case was definitely not related to the vaccine and that the two other cases had no evidence that supported the conclusion that vaccines kill. None.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

The risk of post-vaccine mortality

One of the most surprising pieces of data is that the non-external causes of death (those that might be related to vaccines) after vaccination was 43% lower than the general population, a statistically significant number. In other words, getting a vaccine probably reduces your risk of death from all non-external causes.

Why? The reduction of disease is the obvious one.  But also, we can assume someone who is vaccinated is generally healthier, seeks better healthcare practices, and simply doesn’t die early.

So to those of you who claim that vaccines kill – well I have evidence in a cohort study that vaccines save lives. How about that?


  1. The study looked at deaths after 8.5 million vaccinations in the VSD.
  2. Only 76 deaths were found within 30 days of the vaccination, the biologically plausible cutoff date for a temporal causal relationship.
  3. Of those 76 deaths, 17 lacked medical records (so the cause of death was indeterminate), 33 were attributed to external causes (homicide, suicide, and accidents), and 26 were attributed to non-external causes. Only three warranted further examination as to causality – of those one was found to not be related, and the other two lacked evidence to establish causality.
  4. The overall risk of death post-vaccination is lower than the general population.

The authors concluded:

Risk of death was not increased during the 30 days after vaccination, and no deaths were found to be causally associated with vaccination.

This was a thorough examination of a population of vaccinated individuals with detailed medical records that allowed neutral observers to deduce whether the vaccine(s) were related to mortality. And what they found was that there was no relationship.

So the hypothesis that “vaccines kill” is rejected. And the hypothesis that “vaccines save lives” is supported.


  1. In case you didn’t know, the Vaccine Safety Datalink is a powerful tool to examine the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. It captures the comprehensive medical histories of over 9 million individuals who are vaccinated annually. The VSD has access to electronic medical records and other data at each site which allows researchers to exhaustively analyze the correlation and causation between vaccinations and medical outcomes – including mortality.
  2. I know what some readers might think – “well just because you exclude those 17 deaths, doesn’t mean that it was not caused by vaccines. That is called the argument from ignorance, which states that if you can’t prove A is true, it does not mean that it’s untrue. Or in this case, just because we can’t prove that those 17 deaths are not linked to vaccines, it means it might be true. That’s just poor logic and science.
  3. This study was, of course, published well before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent vaccinations. We will soon have large studies that will probably show no link between COVID-19 vaccines and mortality. Stay tuned.

Key citations

Michael Simpson
Liked it? Take a second to support Michael Simpson on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Discover more from Skeptical Raptor

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Skeptical Raptor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading