The origins of the COVID-19 pandemic have been a subject of intense speculation and debate since its emergence in late 2019. One prominent theory that has gained traction is the idea that the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that cause COVID-19, was the result of a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This is often called the “COVID-19 lab leak theory.”
This paper aims to critically examine and debunk the COVID-19 lab leak theory by analyzing the available scientific evidence, expert opinions, and investigations conducted thus far. The preponderance of scientific evidence suggests the virus came from non-human animals, called zoonotic spillover, which remains the most plausible explanation for the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Before we proceed, I need to make it clear that a scientific theory is a scientific fact. It is not guesswork, it is not something pulled out of thin air. Scientific theories describe the mechanisms (causality) of observed phenomena, and they are based on a substantial list of published evidence. The COVID-19 lab leak “theory” is not a scientific theory, it is much closer to being a conspiracy theory, which has zero published evidence supporting it.
I’m probably not going to change the name by myself, but this really should be called the “lab leak hypothesis,” but I can only hope.
That being said, there is really no sinister evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 was leaked, either intentionally or unintentionally, from some laboratory within the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And there is a substantial amount of evidence that the virus emerged from or evolved in the Huanan Market of Wuhan, China.
Debunking the COVID-19 lab leak theory
As I wrote above, there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was leaked accidentally or intentionally from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. On the other hand, there is a lot of evidence that contradicts the lab leak theory.
I have divided the scientific evidence into five broad categories with the key published research that supports it.
Genomic Analysis: One crucial piece of evidence is the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2. Genomic analysis has revealed that the virus is closely related to other known coronaviruses found in bats, particularly RaTG13. The genetic similarity suggests a natural origin, as it is unlikely that such a virus could be engineered in a laboratory to mimic these complex relationships.
Virus Evolution: Studies have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits typical signs of natural evolution. The virus has features consistent with a zoonotic origin, including genetic adaptations that enable it to bind to human cells and spread efficiently. These adaptations appear to have occurred naturally over time, ruling out the possibility of artificial manipulation.
Intermediate Hosts: The presence of intermediate hosts is a hallmark of zoonotic transmission. Investigations have identified mink, pangolins, and other animals as potential intermediate hosts that could have facilitated the transmission of the virus from bats to humans. The lab leak theory does not adequately explain the presence of these intermediate hosts and their role in the virus’s transmission.
Epidemiological Evidence: Epidemiological studies have traced the early cases of COVID-19 to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China. While the market was initially considered a possible source of the outbreak, subsequent investigations have revealed cases with no direct market link. This suggests that the market might have acted as an amplifier rather than the original source of the virus.
Expert Consensus: Numerous experts in virology, epidemiology, and public health have expressed their views on the lab leak theory. The majority of experts contend that the available evidence points towards a natural origin of the virus. The World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an investigation and concluded that a lab leak was “extremely unlikely.”
Evidence supporting COVID-19 lab leak theory
Frankly, there is no overwhelming evidence that supports the belief that the pandemic arose from an intentional or unintentional leak of SARS-CoV-2 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
But there are three key points made by the proponents of the lab leak theory:
- Proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology — this prominent research institute was studying coronaviruses in bats is located in Wuhan, the city where the first cases of COVID-19 were reported. This proximity has led to speculation that the virus might have accidentally escaped from the lab. However, it is purely coincidental that the virus arose near the research institute, which was probably located there because of the availability of zoonotic pathogens.
- Lab Safety Concerns — concerns about lab safety practices at the WIV have been raised in the past. Some argue that lapses in safety protocols could potentially result in the release of a virus. However, there is no evidence supporting this claim.
- Gain-of-Function Research — Gain-of-function research involves modifying viruses to enhance their virulence or transmissibility in order to study their potential impact on humans. Proponents of the lab leak theory argue that such research could have created conditions for the accidental release of a modified virus. Once again, scientists have found no evidence supporting such a claim.
There is neither evidence nor logic backing up the lab leak hypothesis. There is only supposition, unsupported by science, bolstered by politics alone.
On the other hand, there is a wealth of evidence that supports the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus had a zoonotic origin, that the virus evolved from a related coronavirus, and that the virus’ genome is related to coronaviruses found in the wild. Expert scientists, men and women who have studied viruses and epidemiology for decades, dismiss the lab leak hypothesis because it is not supported by any data whatsoever.
Like the false claims about the COVID-19 vaccine (of which there are so many that are unsupported by actual scientific evidence), this lab leak theory exists almost exclusively as a political belief rather than fact-based.
- Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):450-452. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9. PMID: 32284615; PMCID: PMC7095063.
- Artika IM, Ma’roef CN. Laboratory biosafety for handling emerging viruses. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017 May;7(5):483-491. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 7. PMID: 32289025; PMCID: PMC7103938.
- Devaux CA, Pinault L, Delerce J, Raoult D, Levasseur A, Frutos R. Spread of Mink SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Humans: A Model of Sarbecovirus Interspecies Evolution. Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 20;12:675528. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.675528. PMID: 34616371; PMCID: PMC8488371.
- Lam TT, Jia N, Zhang YW, Shum MH, Jiang JF, Zhu HC, Tong YG, Shi YX, Ni XB, Liao YS, Li WJ, Jiang BG, Wei W, Yuan TT, Zheng K, Cui XM, Li J, Pei GQ, Qiang X, Cheung WY, Li LF, Sun FF, Qin S, Huang JC, Leung GM, Holmes EC, Hu YL, Guan Y, Cao WC. Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7815):282-285. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2169-0. Epub 2020 Mar 26. PMID: 32218527.
- Maxmen A. Wuhan market was epicentre of pandemic’s start, studies suggest. Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7899):15-16. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00584-8. PMID: 35228730.
- Pekar JE, Magee A, Parker E, Moshiri N, Izhikevich K, Havens JL, Gangavarapu K, Malpica Serrano LM, Crits-Christoph A, Matteson NL, Zeller M, Levy JI, Wang JC, Hughes S, Lee J, Park H, Park MS, Ching Zi Yan K, Lin RTP, Mat Isa MN, Noor YM, Vasylyeva TI, Garry RF, Holmes EC, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Andersen KG, Worobey M, Wertheim JO. The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2. Science. 2022 Aug 26;377(6609):960-966. doi: 10.1126/science.abp8337. Epub 2022 Jul 26. PMID: 35881005; PMCID: PMC9348752.
- WHO-convened Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2. Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 2021.
- Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shen XR, Wang X, Zheng XS, Zhao K, Chen QJ, Deng F, Liu LL, Yan B, Zhan FX, Wang YY, Xiao GF, Shi ZL. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Erratum in: Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7836):E6. PMID: 32015507; PMCID: PMC7095418.